Justia Badge
Top 100 Trial Lawyers

Compensation for Meal and Rest Break Violations

Legal Representation for Southern California Meal and Rest Break Violations

Employers often try to pressure employees to skip breaks, work through them, or come back to work early. However, California employee protections are robust, particularly compared to other states. In fact, California boasts some of the most favorable employment laws for employees in the nation. Almost all of California’s employment laws favor the employee, and the laws about meal and rest violations are no exception.

At the Law Offices of David M. Boertje, we understand how difficult it can be to assert even legally protected rights in an environment where you may feel that you lack real power, so we are here to help level the playing field by giving you the representation that you deserve.

Meals and Breaks You Are Legally Entitled to

Under California law, employees are entitled to a paid 10-minute break for every four hours worked (or over 2 hours, as that’s considered a “major fraction” of 4 hours). Additionally, once workers reach five hours, they are entitled to an unpaid 30-minute break (unless the shift is 6 hours or less). If an employee works more than 10 hours, they are entitled to two unpaid 30-minute breaks.

What is the Compensation for Missed Meal and Rest Breaks

Under California law, you are entitled to one full hour of pay for each missed rest period and each missed meal period. For instance, if you work an 8-hour shift and your employer does not permit you to take any meal or rest breaks, you would be entitled to three full hours of pay, two for the missed 10-minute rest breaks, and one for the missed 30-minute break.

What Employers Don’t Want You to Know About Meal and Rest Breaks:
  • If you are required to remain on the employer’s premises during your break, you must be paid for your entire 30-minute break.
  • If you are required to work for any part of your break, you must be paid for your entire 30-minute break.
  • If you are “on duty” for any part of your break, even if business is slow, you must be paid for your entire 30-minute break. California courts have held that requiring an employee to remain on call, or to keep a radio, walkie-talkie, or other communication device with them during their break constitutes being “on duty,” and requires the employer to pay the employee for the entire break period.
  • Unless an employee is working a shift of six hours or less, the only situation in which an employer can waive or cancel an employee’s break is with the written consent of the employee. This also applies to “on duty meal” situations. It’s also important to note that the employee is under no obligation to write or provide that consent legally. If an employee does refuse to provide written consent to waive their break and then experiences adverse employment action, such as being demoted or fired, a retaliation suit against the employer may also apply.
  • Your employer cannot count toilet breaks as rest breaks.
Call Our Office Today

If you are being denied the meal and rest breaks that you are legally entitled to, let us help you get the payment that you have earned. Contact our offices today, serving San Diego County, and all of greater Southern California. If your California employer has denied you meal and rest breaks, or committed other unlawful, illegal, or unfair practices, we will help you get the accountability and compensation that you deserve. We offer free consultations by phone and online 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Client Reviews
“Brian is a great lawyer. He is compassionate and kind and truly cares about his clients and their situations. If you are with him, you are in good hands as he will do everything he can to help you!” Jennifer
“We were in a very difficult situation with a car accident. Many attorneys wouldn't take my case. Bryan worked with my family and helped us through a difficult situation. He kept me informed and let my family know how things were progressing. In the unfortunate event I have to call an attorney, I will only call Bryan Mortlock.” Aaron
“David is honest and conscientious. I've known him and worked with David and his staff for several years, and trust him, implicitly. He's also an excellent trial attorney, and truly cares about his clients. Very hard working, and has an excellent support staff. If I ever needed assistance, David is the first person I would call.” Steven
“Mr. Boertje was extremely helpful in one of the most trying times in my life. He was kind, understanding, professional and effective in getting my case resolved. I would highly recommend retaining him. Any time I had questions or concerns, he was very quick to answer and honest about what the outcome might be. I know if I ever had a case again, I would not hesitate to hire him.” Aaron